Petitioners did not appear through counsel on multiple occasions including the hearing on 12.12.2017. The impugned order was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's consistent absence and lack of representation.
Present petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
versus S.E.INVESTMENTS LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.P.Nagesh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
In spite of pass over none appears on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner was also unrepresented on 20.04.2017 and 23.08.2017.
In view of the above, present petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
DECEMBER 12, 2017/vp
SAGAR PRAVIN SHAH & ANR.
S.E. INVESTMENTS LTD
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
