The High Court of Delhi transferred a petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act 1956 to the Principal Bench of the NCLT in compliance with a 2016 notification and directed the transmission of the record.
Matter listed before Principal Bench, NCLT on 27 February 2017; record directed to be transmitted to NCLT forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
IN THE MATTER OF AGRIM MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Shuchi Sejwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aparna Mudiam, AROC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 01.02.2017
In terms of the notification Regd. No.D.L.-33004/99 dated 07.12.2016, issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and in particular, Clause 3 thereof, the present petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act 1956, stands transferred to the Principal Bench, National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘NCLT’).
In the first instance, list this matter before the Principal Bench, NCLT on 27th February 2017 for further proceedings, in accordance with law.
The Registry is directed to transmit the record of the present petition to the Principal Bench, NCLT, forthwith.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
FEBRUARY 01, 2017 Aj
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act 1956 should be transferred to the Principal Bench of the NCLT.
Whether the record of the transferred petition should be transmitted to the NCLT for further proceedings.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Agrim Marketing Private Limited & Ors.
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
