Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a petition following a settlement between the parties facilitated by a mediator. The court granted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Biswajit Choudhury, Advocate.
versus
UNILINE ENERGY SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Mr. Amit Kumar & Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
% 19.01.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties with the aid and assistance of the mediator, which has been acted upon.
In view of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
JANUARY 19, 2017 ‘AA’
Exide Industries Ltd.
Uniline Energy Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
