The Court granted anticipatory bail to Kamal Solanki in an FIR alleging trespass and theft involving his family members, noting his alleged role was par with co-accusees already granted bail.
Grants anticipatory bail on personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety, subject to conditions of not leaving the country and intimating address changes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10# $~
| versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| STATE OF NCT | OF DELHI | ..... Respondent |
| Represented by: | Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the | |
| State with SI Brahm Pal Singh, | ||
| PS Malviya Nagar. | ||
| Ms. Amrita Chatterjee, | ||
| Advocate for the complainant. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 08.05.2017
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 08, 2017 ‘vn’
Page 2 of 2
BAIL APPLN. 448/2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the circumstances of the case.
Whether the petitioner's role in the alleged trespass and theft was similar to the co-accusees who had already been granted bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamal Solanki
State of NCT of Delhi
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
