A single judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR alleging assault and hurt. The court noted the nature of injuries were blunt and not sharp-edged, and another accused involved already had bail.
Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33# $~
STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Jai Vir Singh, PS K.M. Pur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 02.05.2017
had already been given on 11th January, 2017. Further for the same incident cross-FIR was also registered on the complaint of Jai Kumar, uncle of the petitioner because Ankit @ Amit received injuries in the incident which is not explained in the present FIR.
case of any change of address the same will be intimated to the court concerned by way of affidavit.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 02, 2017
‘vn’
Page 3 of 3
BAIL APPLN. 438/2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving disputes over property and alleged assault with a rod and sharp weapon.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nitin Verma
State of Delhi
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
