The High Court of Delhi granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving assault and grievous hurt. The court noted the injured party was discharged and parties had settled, making further custody unnecessary for investigation.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹25,000/- with one surety of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1# $~
VEENU @ AJAY ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sameer Chandra, Mr. Vineet Jindal and Ms. Alka Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for the State with ASI Pradeep Kumar, PS Ali Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 04.01.2017
Sonu again attacked Vicky with bricks who was able to save himself. In the meantime, the petitioner attacked Mukesh on the right side of the stomach with a sharp edged weapon inflicting injuries on him.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 04, 2017 ‘vn’
BAIL APPLN. 2669/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner considering the discharge of the injured and settlement of the matter.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
VEENU @ AJAY
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
