Pardeep v. State

$~15

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

• • BAIL APPLN. 148/2017

PARDEEP ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Trideep and Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Advs.

versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through : Dr. M.P. Singh, APP

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R % 21.03.2017

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the husband of the complainant. Complainant has lodged the FIR after four years of marriage. As per the complainant herself, petitioner, along with his mother and sister, had forcibly poured poisonous substance in her mouth at the matrimonial home. Father of the complainant has stated that, after pouring poisonous substance, petitioner had dropped the complainant at his house. He took the complainant to hospital, where her treatment was done. Learned counsel submits that complainant left the hospital against the medical advice. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Complainant was admitted in the hospital at about 7:50 pm; whereas as per

the complainant, poisonous substance was poured in her mouth at about 6:00 pm to 6:30 pm at the matrimonial home. He further submits that CCTV footage of the neighbouring areas shows that petitioner had gone on a motorcycle with the complainant at about 3:30 pm and come back alone on his motorcycle on 4:00 pm, thus, plea of complainant on the face of it is not true.