Petitioner challenged illegal construction. Respondent counsel recorded submission on initiating actions against unauthorized work. Court disposed of petition noting similar actions.
None specifically granted; petition disposed of in camera after recording respondent counsel's assurance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
Through Mr. O.P.Saxena and Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocates
versus
GURMEET SINGH & ORS
..... Respondents
Through Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for R-2 Ms. Surabhi Arora and Mr Puneet Singh, Advocates for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 03.02.2017
Petitioner is aggrieved by the illegal and unauthorized construction which is according to him is permitted to suit property top floor of property bearing no. Plot No. 5, Khasra No. 651/151/2/3/5, Maa Kalyani Kunj, Near CC Colony, Gur Mandi Village, Delhi.
On advance notice counsel for respondent no.2 has put in appearance. Her submission is that illegal deviations in the property have been noted. Work stop notice had been sent to respondent no.3 (Local SHO). All actions in accordance with law shall be initiated and completed. This submission of respondent no.1 is taken on record. It is hoped and expected that this commitment shall be honoured in true letter and spirit. Respondent no. 2 will co-ordinate with respondent no.3 to comply with the order. Needless to state that any adverse order passed against the private respondent shall be
passed after due intimation.
No further orders are called for.
Petition is disposed of.
Order dasti under signatures of Court Master.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 03, 2017 gb
SARVJEET SINGH
GURMEET SINGH & ORS
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
