Petitioners sought time for instructions due to pending petition in Supreme Court; the Court refused to examine the academic issue and disposed of the writ petition without granting directions for firecracker licenses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate for R- 1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 13.12.2017
Ms. Rekha Giri, Advocate had appeared for the petitioner in the morning and had sought time to take instructions in view of the fact that Writ Petition (Civil) No.728/2015, Arjun Gopal and Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., is pending in the Supreme Court.
case licenses are issued, it will be open to the petitioner to ask for revival of the present writ petition by moving an application.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
DECEMBER 13, 2017 NA
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arjun Gopal and Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.Referred¶7
Arjun Gopal and Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Ashish Gulati & Ors.
Union of India
Sanjiv Khanna
Prathiha M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
