Petitioner filed an application for withdrawal of W.P.(C) 9289/2016. The court, while hearing the application, dismissed the petition as withdrawn and cancelled the date fixed for future hearing.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; future hearing date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
RAMESH NAGAR BANDER WALI KHUI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr S. K. Mishra, Advocate.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ram Kumar, Advocate for R-1. Ms Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 11.08.2017
CM No.28864/2017
This is an application filed by the petitioner for withdrawal of the present petition.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he seeks to withdraw the present petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
The date already fixed as 22.09.2017 stands cancelled.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 11, 2017 MK
Ramesh Nagar Bander Wali Khui
Deputy Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
