Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition with interim protection for two weeks pending proceedings in DRT/DRAT, without expressing opinion on merits.
Permission to withdraw petition; interim protection extended for two weeks pending proceedings in DRT/DRAT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
..... Petitioner Through: Mr Chetan Sharma, Sr Adv with Mr Gurmehar Sistani and Mr Arjun Syal, Advs versus
YES BANK LTD. & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr Adv with Mr Neeraj Yadav, Mr Davesh Bhatia, Ms Shweta and Mr Saurabh, Advs for R-1 Mr Arjun Monga, Mr Surya Jyoti S.Paul and Ms Kudrat Sandhu, Advs for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 01.09.2017
After some arguments learned senior counsel for the petitioner under instructions from his client seeks permission of this court to withdraw the petition. He submits that he will be taking appropriate proceedings before appropriate forum which is the DRT/DRAT. His further submission is that he was enjoying an interim protection granted by this court in terms of order dated 05.10.2016. Submission being that this interim protection be continued till the time the petitioner approaches the appropriate forum.
Petition is permitted to be withdrawn. Protection granted by this court on 05.10.2016 shall continue in favour of the petitioner for the next two weeks. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petition.
Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
SEPTEMBER 01, 2017 SU
M/s. Akme Projects Ltd.
Yes Bank Ltd.
Mr. Arjun Monga
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
