This petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Delhi. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw while reserving rights against a prior DRT order.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16.
Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. L.M. Asthana, Mr. Siddhant Asthana, Mr. Siddhant Chopra, Ms. Gauri P. Desai, Mr. Peeyush Ranjan and Mr. Chhaterpal Singh, Advocates
versus
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 15.09.2017
HIMA KOHLI, J
A.K. CHAWLA, J
SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 /rkb
Shalini Ahuja
Orientail Bank of Commerce
Hima Kohli
A.K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
