Petitioner withdrew the writ petition regarding school appointment. Court disposed of the petition to permit petitioner to apply for employment legally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-89
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANUPAM KASHYAP ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Javed Ahmed, Advocate with Mr. Anis Ahmed, Advocate and Mr. Rameez Siddiqui, Advocate.
versus
MANAGER SD PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 03.02.2017
course of dictation of judgment, states that petitioner has given him instructions that in the peculiar facts of this case, the petitioner does not
press the writ petition but petitioner will seek legal employment in accordance with law with any school in Delhi including the respondent no.1.
to apply for appointment in a school in Delhi, of course in accordance with law.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 03, 2017 Ne
Anupam Kashyap
Manager SD Public School
Valmikiji Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
