MCD v. Raju
Case brief
What is this about?
This order disposed of a writ petition challenging a reinstatement award. Counsel for the respondent submitted that since the respondent was already reinstated with full back wages in an earlier Labour Court award, no dispute survived in the present petition.
What the court decided
$~29
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 7702/2005 and CM No.17713/2014
MCD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate
versus
RAJU ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal, Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Sachin Kumar, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
- % 22.08.2017
Time is sought on behalf of the petitioner to seek instructions qua the aspect of the proceedings dated 31.5.2016 to ascertain whether the petitioner was working as a substitute Safai Karamachari since 28.1.2016.
At this stage, Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal, learned counsel for the respondents submits that in terms of the impugned award dated 15.7.2002, the respondent has been reinstated with full back wages w.e.f. 17.3.1995, i.e., the date of termination of service. It is also submitted on behalf of the respondent whilst adverting to the Annexure R-1 annexed to the counter affidavit of the respondent which is the statement of claim on behalf of the workman/respondent arrayed to the present petition with specific reference to paragraph No.1 thereof which reads to the effect :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MCD
- respondent
Raju
Coram
Anu Malhotra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court