In this default order, the petitioner appeared unsupported by counsel, while an applicant present explained the petitioner is his son; the court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
VINOD KUMAR KAUSHIK ..... Petitioner Through None.
versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED AND ANR
..... Respondents Through Mr. Raghav Chadha, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Pankaj Sinha and Ms. Jubli Momalia, Advocates for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 27.11.2017
W.P.(C) 7407/2017 & CM APPL. 30594/2017 (Exemption), 43036/2017 (for impleadment by applicant Mr. Vijay Pal Kaushik)
While none appears for the petitioner, ld. counsel for the applicant Mr. Vijay Pal Kaushik submits that the petitioner is the son of the applicant, and, that the electricity is provided in the portion of the property where the petitioner is residing from the electricity connection provided in the name of the applicant being the owner.
Dismissed in default.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
NOVEMBER 27, 2017/ nn
Vinod Kumar Kaushik
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
Vijay Pal Kaushik
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
