Varsha v. Crpf and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
An order disposing a writ petition regarding the petitioner's eligibility for appointment. The court accepted the respondents' Committee report confirming eligibility and directed expeditious examination.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to approach the Court in case of adverse order; appointment process to be completed within six weeks.
What the court decided
$~13
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 7395/2016 VARSHA ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Advocate. versus CRPF AND ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Gici C. George,Advocate for R-1 and 2. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Nitish Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R % 01.09.2017
In terms of our last order dated 24th July, 2017, the respondents had constituted a Committee of doctors/specialists to examine whether the degree of Bachelor of Science in Medical Imaging Technology issued by Indira Gandhi National Open University meets the eligibility requirement stipulated in the advertisement.
As per the report of the said Committee, the petitioner satisfies the minimum eligibility requirement.
In view of the aforesaid position, the respondents state that the case of the petitioner would be examined in accordance with law and if she qualifies, she would be so appointed. The said exercise, we hope and trust, would be completed expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Varsha
- respondent
CRPF and Ors
Coram
Sanjiv Khanna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court