Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court granted the liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition with appropriate facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YESUDASAN P L ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D’souza Philip, Adv.
versus
THE RESIDENT COMMISSIONER KERALA HOUSE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. G. Prakash and Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 03.07.2017
Mr. D’souza Philip, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that as subsequent developments have taken place during the pendency of the writ petition, he wishes to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one with appropriate facts.
With liberty as prayed for, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JULY 03, 2017 /jg
YESUDASAN P L
THE RESIDENT COMMISSIONER KERALA HOUSE
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
