Bhima Sanitations v. Commissioner of Vat & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition rendered infructuous as the refund order had already been issued. Disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
BHIMA SANITATIONS ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Khursheed Ahmed, Advocate. versus
COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 09.11.2017
Learned counsels for the respondents and petitioner state that the refund order has been issued.
In view of the aforesaid position, the writ petition is rendered infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 09, 2017/ dk
Bhima Sanitations
Commissioner of VAT & Anr
Sanjiv Khanna
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court