The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition in default due to non-appearance by the petitioner on both calls, passing an order on 09.03.2017.
Writ petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DR. VEERA NARAYANA B. ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 09.03.2017
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
MARCH 09, 2017 ib
DR. VEERA NARAYANA B.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
