Ashok Kumar & Anr. v. MCD
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a writ petition regarding demolition threats against the petitioner's property at Nabi Karim, noting a respondent statement denying a fixed program and clarifying that future demolition orders will require due notice.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed, noting no demolition program is fixed; future demolition orders to be passed only after due notice.
What the court decided
$~14
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 5614/2010 and CM No. 11024/2010 (stay) ASHOK KUMAR & ANR
..... Petitioners Through Mr. S. C. Singhal, Advocate
versus
MCD
..... Respondent Through Mr. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate with Mr. Shakeel Ahmad, AE, SP Zone, NDMC
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR O R D E R % 20.03.2017
On the last date ie. 23.02.2017 a statement of the respondent had been recorded under instructions that there is no demolition program fixed qua the property of the petitioner i.e. 10853 to 10856, Jhandewalan Road, Nabi Karim, Phahar Ganj, New Delhi as on date.
This appeal is disposed of noting that there is nothing which really survives in this petition. It is however made clear that as and when demolition order is proposed to be passed against this property it will be after due notice to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ashok Kumar & Anr
- respondent
MCD
Coram
Indermeet Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court