Petitioner was granted work for supplying midday meals to children across multiple schools. As the work was accepted and parties agreed, no further directions were necessary in this writ petition.
Writ petition disposed as petitioner was granted work which was accepted; no further directions required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
..... Respondent
Through: Ms Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr, Sunil Goel, Ms Supreet Bindra & Ms Anushruti, Advs. with Ms Sujata Malik, Sujata Malik, Dy. Director, Education for NDMC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
% 19.01.2017
The petitioner has also been granted work to the extent of supplying midday-meals to 32476 children spread over 16 schools in the Civil Lines Zone under the subject EOI. The same has also been accepted by the petitioner. That being the case, no further directions are necessary in the writ petition. The same stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JANUARY 19, 2017 ns
Surya Charitable & Welfare Society
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
