Hon'ble High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition declaring it infructuous as the dispute was settled and the respondent agreed to pay the concerned amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS ..... Petitioner Through : Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate.
versus
TOURISM FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA (TFCI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Vinod Kumar, Advocate. Sh. V.P. Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
% 01.05.2017
It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the disputes are settled and that the respondent has agreed to pay the amount concerned, i.e. `7,97,75,000/- (Rupees Seven Crores Ninety Seven Lakhs Seventy Five Thousand) to the petitioner within the next two days. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
YOGESH KHANNA, J
MAY 01, 2017/ajk
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS
TOURISM FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA (TFCI)
S. Ravindra Bhat
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
