Savdhoo v. Neetu & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an order allowing withdrawal of a succession petition with liberty to file afresh. Court found lack of evidence that petitioner appeared in succession case or that Section 151 application was taken up, concluding no illegality or lack of jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
The petition challenging the impugned order was dismissed.
What the court decided
$~6
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- C.R.P. 52/2017
SAVDHOO ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Kamal Jindal, Advocate.
versus
NEETU & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R
% 23.05.2017
- The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5th November, 2016 whereby the learned ACJ, North-East District, Karkardooma Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition in Succession Case No.7299/15 with liberty to file the same afresh.
- The only grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that notice of the application under Section 151 CPC was not given to the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order allowing withdrawal of the succession petition with liberty to file afresh was passed without jurisdiction or illegal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAVDHOO
- respondent
NEETU & ORS
Coram
PRATIBHA RANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court