The petitioner submitted that electricity supply was restored, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The court disposed of the matter accordingly.
Petition disposed off on grounds of restoration of electricity supply making it infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Surendra Mishra and Ms. Sonal Mishra, Advs.
versus
BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Arav Kapoor,Adv. for R-1. Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Adv. for R-2 with Mr. Mahipal Singh, SI, PS Prasad Nagar. Mr. Shalley, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 21.07.2017
Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the electricity has come to be restored by respondent no.1and in view thereof, the petition has become infructuous. It is disposed off accordingly.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JULY 21, 2017 rc
Mukesh Kumar
BSES Yamuna Power Ltd
A. K. Chawla
Mukesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
