Application to withdraw a reserved writ petition allowed upon parties entering a settlement via an MOU dated 28.12.2016. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Application to withdraw writ petition allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~SDB-1
ABB AB & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Ms Nupur Ahluwalia, Adv. with Mr Prashant Kumar, Adv. for petitioner no.1. Mr Surjendu Sankar Das, Adv. with Ms Avlokita Rajvi, Adv. for the petitioner no.2 (BHEL). versus
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED... Respondent Through: Ms Sharmila Upadhyay, Adv. with Mr Pawan Upadhyay, Adv. and Mr Rajesh Chhetri, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 06.01.2017
This is an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. The writ petition had been heard and judgment was reserved. However, during the intervening period the parties entered into discussion and the same culminated in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 28.12.2016 whereby the parties have settled the issues which had arisen between them. In view of the MOU, a copy of which is annexed to this application as Annexure-1, the petitioners seek to withdraw the writ petition.
We have heard the counsel for the parties. We allow this application. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the MOU which has been entered into between the parties on 28.12.2016.
This application as well as the writ petition stand disposed of accordingly.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
JAYANT NATH, J
JANUARY 06, 2017 kb
ABB AB & ANR
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
