This order registers the withdrawal of the petitioner's writ petition by permission of the Court, subject to the liberty to approach the Court again if required.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Mohita, Adv. along with Sgt. Vikas Kochar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
% 11.09.2017
Counsel for the respondents states that the details of Smt. Sumati M. Deshmukh are on records of the respondents. This possibly was the reason why the petitioner had filed an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach Court, if required.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 SRwt
MAN SINGH DESHMUKH
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
SANJIV KHANNA
NAVIN CHAWLA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
