This order disposed of a writ petition regarding a deposited award amount due to three workers. The court allowed release of funds upon the petitioner's undertaking, clarifying that the payment is not an admission of liability.
The amount deposited by the petitioner to be released to three respondents in equal shares; copy of order given dasti.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S JENSONS INTERNATIONAL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Ashoka Jain, Advocate.
versus
GARIB DASS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Mr.Sunil Dwivedi, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 10.07.2017
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 3548/2015
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JULY 10, 2017 dk
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 3548/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's firm should release the deposited amount to the workers in full and final settlement.
M/S JENSONS INTERNATIONAL
Garib Dass
Ram Jatan
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
