Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the petition as withdrawn and a miscellaneous application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Ms. Anshul Sharma and Ms. Nupur, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 21.04.2017
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that appropriate remedy, as may be available to petitioner, would be taken in accordance with law. He seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
APRIL 21, 2017/ dk
NARESH KUMAR
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA AND ANR
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
