The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition after the respondent revised its banning policy. This single-paragraph order dismisses the petition as withdrawn.
Petition and all pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
TEHRAN JONOOB, TECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTON COMPANY ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Ramnesh Jerath, Advocate.
versus
GAIL INDIA LTD. & ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through Ms Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 03.11.2017
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 03, 2017 pkv
TEHRAN JONOOB, TECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTON COMPANY
GAIL INDIA LTD.
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
