Dismissed
Saroj Gopal v. the State Election Commissioner & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3316/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna and Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advs. for R-1 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 18.04.2017
In view of the judgment dated 11th April, 2017 passed by Division
Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.250/2016 titled as Ravinder
Negi Vs. State Election Commission & Anr., present writ petition is not entertained and is dismissed. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
APRIL 18, 2017/ dk
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ravinder Negi Vs. State Election CommissionDistinguished¶6
Letters Patent Appeal No.250/2016 Ravinder Negi Vs. State Election Commission
Saroj Gopal
The State
Election Commissioner
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court