The writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with a liberty to approach the appropriate authority for further legal remedies.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
ANIL DUTT SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Goutam Prasad, Advocate.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 17.04.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate remedies in law.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
APRIL 17, 2017 st
Anil Dutt Sharma
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
