Union of India v. Narain Dass & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Division Bench did not assemble to decide the matter, resulting in no decision being rendered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P. (C) 3213/2017 & Review Pet. 72/2018, C.M. Appl.6289/2018 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates versus
NARAIN DASS & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Manoj Joshi, Mr. Devik Singh and Mr. Naven Maheshwari, Advocates for R- 2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
%
O R D E R 23.02.2018
The Hon’ble Division Bench did not assemble today, as Vipin Sanghi, J. is chairing COFEPOSA hearing at Amritsar, Punjab. List on 16.03.2018.
(COURT MASTER)
FEBRUARY 23, 2018 PB
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Union of India
- respondent
Narain Dass & Another
Coram
Vipin Sanghi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court