Surender Kumar Gupta v. Anand Gupta
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition and pending applications abated due to the death of the petitioner without appearance by legal representatives; disposed with consequences abatement.
The petition and pending applications abated due to the death of the petitioner without appearance by legal representatives; disposed with consequences abatement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21 $~
SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
ANAND GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Sarita Choudhry, Advocate for Mr. Hemant Goel, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 01.12.2017
I.As. 19961/2015, 4029/2016, 4030/2016, 9491/2016 & 11192/2016
Learned counsel for respondent states that petitioner has expired on 06th September, 2017. She states that respondent is the brother of the petitioner. She has handed over a photocopy of the death certificate of the petitioner. The same is taken on record.
Since none appears for the legal representatives of the petitioner, present petition and pending applications are disposed of as having abated.
MANMOHAN, J
DECEMBER 01, 2017 js
SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA
ANAND GUPTA
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court