The single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition alleging illegal construction permitted on respondent No.2's property. The Court accepted the Corporation's assurance to take action within 12 weeks and ordered no further intervention.
No further orders called for; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.
..... Respondents Through Ms.Anju Gupta and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advocate for R-1/SDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 13.01.2017
C.M. No.1414/2017 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application disposed of.
W.P.(C) 303/2017 & C.M. No.1413/2017
Petitioner is aggrieved by the illegal and unauthorized construction which has been permitted to respondent no.2 in property bearing plot Nos.A-82 and A-83 Gali No.6, Sewak Park, New Delhi. It is stated that this is against all the bye-laws of the Corporation.
On advance notice learned counsel for respondent no.1/SDMC has put in appearance. His submission is that the deviation in the aforenoted property has been noted and action has been taken; the property already stands booked and a show cause notice has also been issued to the private respondent namely respondent no.2. His further submission is that all actions which have been initiated will be taken
to its ultimate goal. This statement of the respondent no.1 is taken on record which has been made under instruction from his Authorized Representative. It is hoped and expected that that this commitment made to the Court shall be honoured in true letter and spirit. Learned counsel for respondent further submits that all actions shall be completed against the aforenoted property within an outer limit of 12 weeks from today. Police assistance whenever necessary may be obtained.
No further orders are called for in this petition.
Petition disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JANUARY 13, 2017 ndn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition alleging unauthorized construction without further orders.
Raj Mohan Singh
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Respondent No.2
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
