The court disposed of multiple writ petitions following the precedent set by a Coordinate Bench in Lalit Gulati vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, despite pending Letters Patent Appeal and stay orders.
All present writ petitions were disposed of in accordance with the judgment in Lalit Gulati vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
^ .
.\K
AND
n t- '! . 'y • '
.+ W.P.(C): 9203/2007
DEV ARORA ..... Petitioner Through None . versus BSES RAJDHANI POWERLTD. ^ Through None Respondents
AND
KRISHNA CONTINENTAL LTD. .... Petitioner , Through None
versus-
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. AND ANR. .... Respondents : : n , Through; None AND 6. + :W;P ■(0)7435/2010 SURIAND SURIPVT LTD. .... Petitioner Through None-
versus NDPL AND ORS Respondents : Through; None - AND. '
7.,
+ W.B.(G);8633/^0i0 ^
¥'
GURDARSHAN LAL CHANANA
Petitioner
A- : ATHrougH" None
versus
NDPL
Tlirough-. None
• • Respondent
AND
^8. • + . W.P.(G) 2799/2011 &.CMAPPL. 5954/2011
VlNOD KUMAR GUPTA /; . ., ; Through None
Petitioner
versus
GNGT OF DELHI
Through None
Respondent
V V: and.
At. W:R(C):3164/2011 V
ALLIED MOTORS LIMITED : A Through n None . versus GOVT OF NGT OF DELHI AND ANR. / - Through None
Petitioner
Respondents:
-.AND n
• vt ■* 1' !i it-i
(/ ■■
PUNJAB NATIONAL PRESS ..... Petitioner None . versus
.GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents ; : : : Through Mr.Satyakam, ASC for R-l/GNCTD.
AND
.11; W.P.CC) 53.08/20-12.
ALANKRIt HANDICRAFTS PVT. LTD. Petitioner , ; Thrqugh .None
. -r versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. AND ANR. Respondents . Through None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
ORDER % 14.02.2017
matters is covered by the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court inXfl/// Gulati Us. Govt. of NCT ofDelhi, 176 (2011) DLTl
In fact, the present batch of matters has been repeatedly adjourned to await the orders in LPA No.724/2011. . . .
■ However, neither pendency of the Letters Patent Appeal nor the
stay granted by the Division Bench can take away the precedentary value of the judgment of the Coordinate Bench in Lali, Gulati (supra) Consequently, the present writ petitions are disposed of in accordance with the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Lalit Gulati (supra).
FEBRUARY 14, 2017 KA . .
MANMOHAN, J
O
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present batch of writ petitions should be disposed of in accordance with the judgment of a Coordinate Bench in Lalit Gulati.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalit Gulati vs. Govt. of NCT of DelhiReferred¶51
Lalit Gulati vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 176 (2011) DLT 1 · Who else cites this
LPA No.724/2011Referred¶52
LPA No.724/2011
DEV ARORA
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.
KRISHNA CONTINENTAL LTD.
NDPL
SURIAND SURIPVT LTD.
GURDARSHAN LAL CHANANA
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
