The High Court of Delhi granted liberty to withdraw two writ petitions filed by petitioners seeking remedies under Section 31 of the R land Acquisition Act, 2013. Both petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to withdraw petitions and seek remedies under Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25&26
Appearance: Mr. Akhilesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for petitioners in both cases.
Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pathak, Advocate for LAC/L&B with Mr. Sunil Kr. Jha, Advocate, in W.P.(C)2466/2016.
Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, in W.P.(C) 2494/2016.
Mr. Chiranjiv Sharma, Advocate for UOI in both matters.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
%
O R D E R 17.04.2017
After some hearing, learned counsel sought liberty to withdraw the writ petitions and seek appropriate remedies for contesting the proceedings under Section 31 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for determination of the share and appropriation of the amounts deposited, in accordance with law. Liberty granted.
Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
APRIL 17, 2017 /vikas/
I.S. MEHTA, J
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lekhi Devi
Usha Devi
Land Acquisition Collector
S. Ravindra Bhat
I.S. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
