Nitin Kumar Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought Government employment but acknowledged CAT jurisdiction. Court refused dismissal and transferred petition to CAT Principal Bench, New Delhi for decision.
What did the court decide?
Petition transferred for decision to Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 2306/2016
NITIN KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for respondent No.4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R
% 02.02.2017
- Petitioner seeks employment with Government of NCT of Delhi. Therefore the issues, which arise in this writ petition, have to be decided by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. 2. Instead of dismissing the petition, at the request of the petitioner, this petition is transferred for decision to CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi. Parties to appear before the CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi on 1st March, 2017. Registry will ensure that file of this case is available to Registrar of CAT on the date fixed.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can seek employment with the Government of NCT of Delhi when jurisdiction lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nitin Kumar Jain
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Valmikij Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court