A writ petition and associated applications were disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner's counsel, who had no instructions to proceed with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
NISHANT KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Motish Kumar Singh, Advocate.
versus
SHYAM LAL COLLEGE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. B.N. Soni, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
O R D E R % 14.03.2017
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
MARCH 14, 2017
AK
Nishant Kumar Singh
Shyam Lal College and Ors
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
