Dismissed
Mrigya Talwar v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1690/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as none appeared for the petitioner during the hearing.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~7
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 1690/2016
¶4
MRIGYA TALWAR ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms Suparna Srivastava and Ms Alinda Bhowal, Advocates.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 09.11.2017
¶9
None appears for the petitioner. It is observed that none had appeared for the petitioner on the previous hearing as well.
¶10
Dismissed for non prosecution.
¶11
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
¶12
NOVEMBER 09, 2017 MK
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mrigya Talwar
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
Vibhu Bakhru
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court