Petitioner sought permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to re-file. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed petition.
Permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to re-file granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for LAC/L&B.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 17.02.2017
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to re-file the same inasmuch as certain facts have inadvertently been left out and certain parties are also to be added.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
FEBRUARY 17, 2017 ns
ANIL JAIN
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
