The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition challenging an order for damages but reserved the question of merits without expressing any opinion on the controversy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PARAS RAM DANGAL SOCIETY & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate with Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati and Mr. Siddarth, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
% 10.02.2017
Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21st January, 2010 passed by respondent No.3-Estate Officer-IV, DDA, wherein petitioner has been asked to pay damages of Rs.34,90,145/- for using the premises bearing Ghat No.13, Kudsia Ghat, Bela Road, near ISBT, Delhi.
Since the order in question is an appealable order, the present writ petition and applications are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal along with an application for condonation of delay against the impugned order in accordance with law.
However, this Court clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. Rights and contentions of all parties are left open.
Order dasti under the signature of Court Master.
MANMOHAN, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2017 js
Paras Ram Dangal Society & Anr
Union of India & Ors
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
