This order records the dismissal of W.P. (C) 12032/2016 before a single judge on non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS..... Respondents Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for SDMC.
Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Neelam Kholiya, Adv. for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
G.S.SISTANI, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
MAY 19, 2017 pst /
NEW ASSOCIATION OF STREET VENDORS OF INDIA
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
GS SISTANI
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
