Disposed
Paragon Cable India v. Pci Ltd.
Delhi HCO.M.P./118/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
PARAGON CABLE INDIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Dayal, Adv.
versus
PCI LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anshul Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
SH. RAVINDER SINGH (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) O R D E R % 28.08.2018
It is pointed out by Ld. counsel for parties that the amount of Bank Guarantee in previous order sheet dated 10-08-2018 is written as Rs. 50,000/- instead of Rs. 50,00,000/-. The error stands corrected.
Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time to file the extended/renewed Bank Guarantee.
List this matter on 14-09-2018.
RAVINDER SINGH (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
AUGUST 28, 2018 kr
PARAGON CABLE INDIA
PCI LTD
RAVINDER SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court