The High Court of Delhi, through Saswati Bhattacharya J, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the submission that original documents pertaining to the underlying civil suit had been transmitted to the concerned District Court, rendering the petition no longer necessary.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JASBIR SINGH LAMBA
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohit Saroha and Mr. Jitendra Singh, Advocates
versus
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Adv. for DHC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 19.04.2017
Learned counsel for the parties confirm that the original documents pertaining to CS (OS) 626/2012 titled as ''Jasbir Singh Lamba & Ors. Vs. Phoolwati & Ors., have been transmitted to the concerned District Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
APRIL 19, 2017 ‘ rs’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition, having been disposed of by the transmission of original documents to the District Court, has become infructuous.
Jasbir Singh Lamba
The Registrar General
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
