Dismissed

M/S Tiger Rubber Company v. Mahesh Kumar & Anr.

Delhi HC1 Aug 2017W.P.(C)/11351/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner withdrew a petition. The Court dismissed the petition, ordered the petitioner to release awarded arbitration amounts and deposit litigation expenses with the Registrar General, and to pay the same to the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; award amount and litigation expenses to be deposited with Registrar General for release to respondent.

M/S Tiger Rubber Company Vs Mahesh Kumar & Anr. — Delhi HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~15

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11351/2016 & CM APPL. 44470/2016 M/S TIGER RUBBER COMPANY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Satyalipsu Ray, Advocate

¶4

versus

¶5

MAHESH KUMAR & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. D.K. Pandey, Mr. Sunil Dwivedi, Advs. for R1. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Neelam Khotiya, Adv.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 01.08.2017

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition is to be withdrawn and submits that the litigation expenses may be ordered to be paid to the respondent no. 1.

¶11

Vide order dated 01.03.2017, the petitioner has already been directed to make the payment of litigation expenses of Rs.15,000/- to the respondent no. 1, which was to be paid through a cheque in the name of the respondent no. 1 and was to be sent by registered AD post.

¶12

On behalf of the respondent no. 1, it is stated that the amount of 50% as awarded vide the impugned Award alongwith upto date interest as deposited by the petitioner in terms of the order dated 30.11.2016 amounting to Rs.2,72,500/- as indicated by the office note on the record be allowed to be released to the respondent no. 1 qua which the learned counsel for the petitioner submits to the effect that there is no opposition thereto.

¶13

In relation to the balance 50% of the awarded amount alongwith interest thereon in terms of the impugned Award dated 11.01.2016, the balance 50% of the amount alongwith interest till date is directed to be deposited with the Registrar General of this Court within a period of four weeks and on deposit thereof, the amount be released to the respondent no. 1 on production of proof of his identification before the Registrar General of this Court.

¶14

Litigation expenses imposed vide order dated 01.03.2017 be also deposited with the Registrar General of this Court and are allowed to be released to the respondent no. 1.

¶15

The petition is thus dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

ANU MALHOTRA, J

¶17

AUGUST 01, 2017/mk

M/S Tiger Rubber Company v. Mahesh Kumar & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Tiger Rubber Company v. Mahesh Kumar & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paras Nath Private Iti Vs Directorate General of Training and Anr.

Mukesh Gupta & Ors. Vs Director of Education & Ors.

Prof. S.P.Narang Vs University of Delhi

Dinesh Kumar Arora & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jayant Hospitality Pvt.Ltd. Vs Dy. Commissioner, Department of Excise, Entertainment and Luxury Tax & Anr.

Bharatiya Telecom Employees Union (Bsnl) & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sachin Gaur Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mohammad Ashraf Shaikh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Suman Kumari Vs M/S Bhagini Nivedita College and Anr.

Sanjay Kumar Vs the Union of India & Anr.

Andhra Bank Vs Employees' Provident Fund Organisation & Anr.

Shri Bhogavati Shetkari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Vs Union of India & Ors.

North Delhi Municipal Cororation Vs Chand Ram

M/S Guiness Collection Vs Satya Pal