Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the requested liberty.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19.
SHRI DAYA SHANKAR ..... Petitioner Through Dr. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 12.12.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition and approach the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
DECEMBER 12, 2017 VKR
Daya Shankar
Union of India
Sanjiv Khanna
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
