Single line dismissal order due to non-appearance of petitioner and non-payment of process fee. No substantive legal principle established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
..... Petitioner
Through None.
versus
THE SOUTH ZONE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS
..... Respondents Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for SDMC.
CORAM:
Matter has been called twice. None has appeared for the petitioner. Process fee has also not been filed to serve the respondents. Dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2017 ndn
Abdul Shakir
The South Zone Municipal Corporation
Indermeeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
