It appears that four storeyed unauthorized building has come to be erected, and, for such huge unauthorized construction, the property has come to be booked only today. At this stage, ld. Counsel for the respondent-SDMC interjects to say that the said construction might have been raised, having obtained some sanction of building plan. It may be so. The fact, however, remains that as per the copy of the communication addressed to the SHO which is of date i.e. 1.12.2017 only, it, by itself, records for the owner/builder having carried out unauthorized construction, without sanction or in excess of the sanction. Be that as it may, Is it, the respondent-SDMC came to know of such unauthorized action(s) only after the filing of the instant petition? It raises serious doubt(s) not only about the bonafide in filing the instant petition, but, conduct of the officials of the respondent-SDMC, as well. More so, for the reason, if, ld. Counsel for the respondent-SDMC could be furnished a copy of the communication addressed to the police, there is no reason, as to why, he could not be instructed for the actual status, with regard to the nature of booking done, for the alleged deviation(s) and/or the
