The High Court of Delhi, on withdrawal of the writ petition by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition, dismissed the petition and the pending application.
Liberty to file fresh petition with appropriate documents granted; writ petition and pending application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for LAC/L&B Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Isha Garg, Advocate for respondent-DDA
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
% 07.09.2017
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that she has instructions to withdraw the writ petition, but seek liberty to file fresh petition with appropriate documents. Liberty is granted.
This petition and pending application are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
SEPTEMBER 07, 2017
s
Jagdish Chand Agarwal
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors
S. Ravindra Bhat
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
