This order dismisses a writ petition filed as a PIL challenging AIIMS recruitment advertisements. The Court held the petition not maintainable as a PIL but left the merits unexpressed before granting leave to withdraw.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
A.I.I.M.S AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. P.S. Singh with Ms. Annu Singh and Ms. Swati Bansal, Advs. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
%
29.11.2017
only to AIIMS Delhi. It is pointed out that the same has not been permitted by AIIMS, Jodhpur.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 29, 2017 /pmc
W.P.(C) No.10596/2017
Pg.2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging AIIMS recruitment advertisements is maintainable as a public interest litigation.
Whether the authority has power to relax qualifications for a particular category applicable only to AIIMS Delhi.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prayas Sewa Samiti
A.I.I.M.S and Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
